Aristotle begins with a claim that is as simple as it is profound: human beings, by nature, desire to know. But what do we most want to know? What kind of knowledge actually satisfies our rational desire?
Here is Aristotle’s answer:
“The first principles and causes are most knowable, for by reason of these and from these all other things are known. But these are not known by means of the things subordinate to them.”
In other words, what the human mind ultimately seeks is more than just facts. It seeks first causes—those foundational realities by which everything else becomes intelligible.
That point is worth lingering over and asking: can AI do the same?
For Aristotle, first principles are not conclusions you arrive at after a series of deductions. They are the starting points—those truths that make deduction possible in the first place.
So how do we come to know them?
Not by assuming that if we simply accumulate enough information, insight will eventually appear. The human mind must learn to see what is fundamental, and to discern what gives order to everything else.
First principles point us to purpose—to know what things are for. He writes:
“And the science which knows to what end each thing must be done is the most authoritative of the sciences… And this end is the good in each class.”
This is an astonishing claim: the most fundamental form of knowing is the one that understands the end—the “for the sake of which” we strive. Aristotle names this end the good.
To speak of “the good” is to speak of meaning and direction. The good is not a matter of personal preference; it is the reason things are done at all. Knowledge, in Aristotle’s deepest sense, aims at the “why.”
And when we apply this to the world around us, the point becomes vivid:
-
To understand a tree is not merely to know its properties, but to grasp what it is for—its growth, its flourishing, its place in our environment.
-
To understand a cell is not merely to map its components, but to see how it serves a living whole.
-
To understand human society is not merely to track trends or power dynamics, but to ask what a political community is for—what kind of life it is meant to make possible.
This is what we mean by wisdom: not just knowing that something is, but understanding why it is—and what it is ordered toward.
That, President Sanford argues, is why the liberal arts are so crucial to avoid being sucked into the AI mirror.
AI can help us in many exceptional ways, but it cannot replace the human longing to know and contemplate the first questions: What is true? What is good? What is this for?
The liberal arts require the deliberate formation of the mind; the patient work of seeing reality clearly; and the training to ask and answer questions about the essence and purpose of things, and along the way to shape our judgment and to grow in wisdom.
More on ‘the why’ next time.